![]() This study has demonstrated a simple, inexpensive method for teaching novice mothers of young children to take their own body circumferences resulting in accurate, reliable data. Differences between participant self- and technician measurements were small (i.e., mean difference ranged from −0.13 to 0.06 inches) with nearly all (≥93 %) differences within Bland-Altman limits of agreement and <10 % exceeding the a priori clinically meaningful difference criterion. Comparison of self-measurements at home vs lab revealed high test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.87). Intraclass Correlations (ICC) comparing self vs technician were high (0.97, 0.96, and 0.84 for waist, hip, and neck). Technical error of measurements for self- and technician- duplicate measurements varied little (0.08 to 0.76 inches) and had very high reliability (≥0.90). Participants ( n = 41 aged 38.05 ± 3.54SD years 71 % white) were all mothers that had at least one child under the age of 12 yrs. Agreement between all possible pairs of measurements were examined using Intraclass Correlations (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. ![]() To assess differences between self- and technician-measured circumferences, duplicate measurements for participant home self-measurements, participant lab self-measurements, and technician measurements each were averaged and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests conducted. A few weeks later, participants visited an anthropometrics lab where they measured themselves again, and trained technicians ( n = 9) measured participants in duplicate using standard equipment and procedures. Afterwards, they created a homemade paper measuring tape from a downloaded file with scissors and tape, took all measurements in duplicate, and entered them into an online survey. MethodsĪt home, mothers of young children viewed a brief, online instructional video on how to measure their waist, hip, and neck circumferences. However, few studies have assessed the test-retest reliability and criterion validity of a self-report tool feasible for use in large scale studies. For epidemiology and intervention studies, including body circumference measurements in self-report surveys could be informative. Medical Scales | Great Gift Ideas © 2000 2023 All rights reserved.Waist, hip, and neck circumference measurements are cost-effective, non-invasive, useful markers for body fat distribution and disease risk. Measurement | InScale Floor Scales | Mark-10 Force Testing | Mettler Toledo® | Minx Economicalĭigital scales | Salter Brecknell | Sartorius Lab Balances | Seca O Meter Scales | Hoto Instruments | Imada Force Mechanical and electronic scales | DigiWeighĬrane Scales, Dynamometers & Force Testing Products| Easy Weigh Legal for Trade Scales | Health Medical Scales | Test Stands / Force Measurement | Veterinary Scales | Floor Scales | Force Gauges | Industrial-Use ![]() Scales | Crane Scales | Deli/Food/Grocery Ĭhat with us via WhatsApp Chat whatsapp: 7īody Composition Monitors | Calibration Weights | Counting The ratio allows conclusions to be drawn about the distribution of fat stores and thus contributes to a diagnosis. The WHR is an indirect method of determining the amount of abdominal fat tissue. The measuring tape seca 203 for determination of body circumference has a high-quality scale of metal used to obtain the Waist-To-Hip-Ratio (WHR). Seca 203IN Circumference tape with waist to hip ratio,0 - 80 inch
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |